The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils (AFIC) has strongly condemned a proposed immigration policy by the Coalition, which advocates for selecting migrants based on "Australian values." AFIC, the peak Muslim organization in Australia, labeled the policy a "deeply divisive and dangerous departure" from the nation's traditional approach to migration. The statement, issued on April 15, 2026, highlights concerns that the policy aims to recast migration as a "cultural and ideological threat."
AFIC's President, Dr. Rateb Jneid, stated, > "This is not about policy detail, it is about the framing of entire communities as inherently suspect." The organization warned that the rhetoric creates a "moral hierarchy of belonging," potentially requiring some communities to constantly prove their legitimacy. AFIC is particularly concerned about the proposal to single out Palestinian arrivals for reassessment, despite having undergone extensive security vetting.
The policy was outlined by Liberal leader Angus Taylor in a recent speech, where he emphasized the importance of values in immigration intake. Taylor's remarks, which included calls for enhanced social media screening and tying visa conditions to an "Australian values" statement, have drawn criticism from various political figures and advocacy groups. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke accused Taylor of "desperate dog whistling," suggesting the move was an attempt to compete with One Nation.
The proposed changes also involve designating certain nations as "safe countries," implying asylum applicants from these places would face refusal and deportation. This stance has been met with strong opposition from refugee advocates, with the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre describing Taylor's speech as a "hateful attack on migrant communities." The debate reflects a broader national discussion on immigration, with concerns about housing and the economy coinciding with increased public worry about migration levels.
AFIC emphasized that migration policy must be rooted in fairness, consistency, and the rule of law, rather than "vague tests of belonging or ideological conformity." The organization urged all political leaders to reject this framing and ensure that immigration policy remains focused on inclusion, dignity, and equal treatment under the law for all.
