India is considering creating a dedicated missile and rocket force, says Defence Secretary R.K. Singh

Image for India is considering creating a dedicated missile and rocket force, says Defence Secretary R.K. Singh

Three services. Three separate missile chains. One big question nobody's asked out loud — until now.

India is quietly debating something huge: a single, unified rocket and missile force.

Think of it as India's own version of what China and Pakistan already built.


🎯 The spark? Operation Sindoor.

May 2025. India fires BrahMos, Pralay, SCALP cruise missiles, long-range artillery and kamikaze drones — deep into Pakistan.

Precision strikes. Terrorist infrastructure. Military targets.

It worked.

But it also exposed a problem.

Right now, India's missile power is scattered.

  • 🪖 Army runs Pralay, Prahaar, Shaurya, BrahMos, Nirbhay, Pinaka
  • ✈️ Air Force controls Astra, BrahMos-A, SCALP
  • 🚢 Navy operates naval BrahMos and ship-based air defence
  • ☢️ Nuclear-capable Agni and K-series sit with the Strategic Forces Command

Four different commands. Four different clocks.

In a crisis, every second lost is a second the enemy gains.

⚡ Why the urgency now?

Because the neighbourhood changed the rules.

China built the PLARF — one of the largest missile forces on Earth, running everything from ICBMs to hypersonics.

Pakistan followed. It stood up its own Army Rocket Force Command on August 13, 2025 — modelled directly on China's playbook.

Defence Secretary R.K. Singh didn't mince words: "Evolving global conflicts and Pakistan's growing conventional missile capabilities have prompted this strategic shift."

India, some say, is now the odd one out.


🧠 But not everyone is convinced

Here's the twist.

Outgoing army chief Gen. Upendra Dwivedi backs the idea — "it is the need of the hour," he said.

But top artillery veterans are pushing back hard.

Lt Gen. P. Ravi Shankar's counter-argument: India already has the nucleus of a deep-strike force in its three artillery divisions. Just expand them. Add drones. Add ISR. Don't build a new bureaucracy.

Lt Gen. Anil Ahuja goes further: a new force means new logistics, new costs — money better spent buying more missiles.

Even outside experts agree it's not obvious. Christopher Clary of the University at Albany says there's no single global model — and a new command only helps if joint coordination is actually broken.

🌊 The real fight isn't about missiles

It's about speed vs structure.

Faster decisions during war.

Versus the risk of duplicating what already exists.

One thing everyone agrees on, though: India's missile arsenal needs to keep growing — indigenous, faster, sharper.

The command chart is still being drawn.

The stakes already aren't.

That's all for now!