Jacqueline Fernandez moves Supreme Court challenging framing of charges in ₹200 crore money laundering case

Image for Jacqueline Fernandez moves Supreme Court challenging framing of charges in ₹200 crore money laundering case

Picture this.

A Bollywood superstar.

A conman running a criminal empire… from inside a jail cell.

A ₹200 crore trail of extortion money.

And gifts so extravagant they sound like a script Netflix would reject for being too wild.

Today, that story landed at India's Supreme Court.


🎬 The plot twist nobody saw coming

Jacqueline Fernandez has moved the apex court.

Not for a film. Not for a contract.

But to fight the framing of charges against her in one of India's most bizarre money laundering cases.

A bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Joymalya Bagchi is set to hear her plea today.

One judge already recused himself earlier. The case is that loaded.


🕵️ Who is Sukesh Chandrashekhar?

A man the ED calls a conman.

A man who, while sitting in jail, allegedly:

  • 📞 Impersonated officials from the PMO, Home Ministry, and Law Ministry
  • 🔐 Used spoofed calls and encrypted apps to sound legit
  • 💰 Extorted around ₹200 crore from the wives of former Ranbaxy promoters Shivinder & Malvinder Singh
  • 🧠 Ran the whole orchestra from behind bars

Yes. From jail.


💝 And then came the gifts

This is where Jacqueline's name enters the story.

The ED says she was in constant contact with Sukesh — and received jaw-dropping presents through his associate Pinky Irani.

The alleged gift list reads like a billionaire's wishlist:

  • 🐎 A horse worth ₹52 lakh
  • 🐱 Three Persian cats, ₹9 lakh each
  • 👜 Designer bags from Gucci and Chanel
  • 💎 Luxury jewellery and crockery
  • 📱 Reportedly 100 iPhones on a birthday

A fairytale… funded, allegedly, by stolen money.


⚖️ Why she's fighting back

On May 30, a Delhi court ordered charges to be framed against Fernandez, Sukesh, and 15 others.

The ED named her as an accused only in a supplementary charge sheet — after summoning her multiple times.

Her defence has always been the same:

👉 She's a victim, not a conspirator.

👉 She didn't know the gifts were proceeds of crime.

👉 She was manipulated by a man pretending to be someone he wasn't.


🔥 The bigger question

This case isn't just about a celebrity.

It's about how easily glamour, money, and crime can braid themselves together — and how hard it is to untangle them once the spotlight hits.

The Supreme Court will now decide where the line sits.

Between gullible… and guilty.

And Bollywood is watching every word.

That's all for now!